Sarah Palin vs. Pit Bull
At last the American right and left have one issue they unequivocally agree on: You don’t actually have to read Sarah Palin’s book to have an opinion about it. Last Sunday Liz Cheney praised “Going Rogue” as “well-written” on Fox News even though, by her own account, she had sampled only “parts” of it. On Tuesday, Ana Marie Cox, a correspondent for Air America, belittled the book in The Washington Post while confessing that she couldn’t claim to have “completely” read it.
“Going Rogue” will hardly be the first best seller embraced by millions for talismanic rather than literary ends. And I am not recommending that others follow my example and slog through its 400-plus pages, especially since its supposed revelations have been picked through 24/7 for a week. But sometimes I wonder if anyone has read all of what Palin would call the “dang” thing. Some of the book’s most illuminating tics have been mentioned barely — if at all — by either its fans or foes. Palin is far and away the most important brand in American politics after Barack Obama, and attention must be paid. Those who wishfully think her 15 minutes are up are deluding themselves.
The book’s biggest surprise is Palin’s wide-eyed infatuation with show-business celebrities. You get nearly as much face time with Tina Fey and the cast of “Saturday Night Live” in “Going Rogue” as you do with John McCain. We learn how happy Palin was to receive calls from Bono and Warren Beatty “to share ideas and insights.” We wade through star-struck lists of campaign cameos by Robert Duvall, Jon Voight (who “blew us away”), Naomi Judd, Gary Sinise and Kelsey Grammer, among many others. Then there are the acknowledgments at the book’s end, where Palin reveals that her intimacy with media stars is such that she can air-kiss them on a first-name basis, from Greta to Laura to Rush.
Posted in Sarah Palin Going Rogue: An American Life
Tagged Air America, Alaska, Ana Marie Cox, Barack Obama, Barbara Walters Sarah Palin, Bob McDonnell, Bono, Bridge to Nowhere, conservatives, death panels, Dick Cheney, Fox News, Gary Sinise, Glenn Beck, Going Rogue, GOP, Greta Van Susteren, Jewish settlements Sarah Palin, John Boehner, John McCain, Jon Voight, Katie Couric, Kelsey Grammer, Levi Johnston, Liz Cheney, Lynn Vincent, Matthew Continetti, McCain-Palin, McCain-Palin campaign, Michael Steele, Mike Huckabee, Mitch McConnell, Mitt Romney, Naomi Judd, Neocons, pallin' around with terrorists, Pat Robertson, Persecution of Sarah Palin, Peter Wehner, Republican convention, Rich Lowry, Robert Duvall, Ronald Reagan, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Sarah Palin Down syndrome, Sarah Palin Going Rogue, Sarah Palin Going Rogue: An American Life, Saturday Night Live, Saturday Night Live Sarah Palin, Thanks But No Thanks, The Washington Post, The Weekly Standard, Tim Pawlenty, Tina Fey, Warren Beatty, Wasilla, William Jennings Bryan, William Kristol
Now that Sarah Palin has announced her resignation as Governor of Alaska, you may wonder: What has she been doing? How will she fill her time? In an Op-Ed piece for The Washington Post, Palin kindly provided an answer. She’s committed herself to a single task: confusing the American public on energy and environment.
Widespread pollution from factories is negatively impacting the global environment.
On Tuesday, Palin’s Op-Ed criticized Obama’s cap and trade bill — known as the American Clean Energy & Security Act, or ACES — and refused to acknowledge the existence of climate change. The article so fully muddles the issues that the best thing one can hope for is that someone else wrote the article, and the Governor simply signed her name.
Behind all the bluster — and the exclamations! that neatly turn fact into fiction — are familiar phrases. She appeals to national independence, rising unemployment, taxes, supply side economics and God’s creation. In so doing, she positions Democrats as enervating technocrats opposed to prosperity, and herself as rooted in a history of economic growth, rugged independence and faith.
To use talking points is one thing, to rely on them another. This isn’t a partisan issue; candidates from both parties have lines they work through. But Palin’s argument is so dependent on established Republican strategy that is reads like a grab bag of worn-out phrases.
This is where Palin’s argument veers from the path of denial. In making her argument, she ignores mounting, if not overwhelming evidence on energy and environment. She also strays from mainstream public opinion.
Posted in Cap and Trade, Governor Sarah Palin
Tagged ACES, Alaska, American Clean Energy & Security Act, cap and tax, Cap and Trade, cap-and-trade energy plan, cap-and-trade program, climate change, David Brooks, Democrats, Governor Sarah Palin, IPCC, Republicans, Sarah Palin, The Washington Post, Waxman-Markey, Waxman-Markey Bill