In an in-depth article by Los Angeles Times writer Kim Murphy, published on September 22, 2008, the environmental policies of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin are summarized, as well as her position on developing oil and gas deposits in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).
Federal scientists flying over the Arctic Ocean last month spotted something nearly unprecedented during their annual count of bowhead whales: nine polar bears in the open sea, miles from anywhere.
One was swimming 60 miles off Barrow. A flight a week or so later found five bears plying their way through the swells. The findings wouldn’t have been so alarming — they are powerful swimmers — except that their likely destination, the sea ice on which the predators depend for survival, had retreated 400 miles offshore.
U.S. Geological Survey biologists believe that, if current climate-change trends continue, every polar bear in Alaska could be gone by 2050.
Yet Gov. Sarah Palin’s administration has fought federal protections announced in May for polar bears, going to court to assert that the projections for a dramatic shrinking of the bears’ icy habitat are unreliable and that polar bears are already protected enough.
Since becoming the Republican vice presidential nominee this month … a review of her record as governor shows that, most often, she has tilted that balance in favor of oil and gas development, mining and hunting — the economic backbones of a state that many residents consider both a scenic treasure and an exploitable resource.
Since Palin became governor in 2006, the state has sought to ramp up a program that encourages the shooting of wolves from aircraft in areas where they compete with human hunters for moose, caribou and deer.
Federal law prohibits aerial hunting of wolves, which can involve planes chasing wounded and terrified animals until they can’t run anymore. But a loophole allows Alaska to impose “airborne predator management” across 60,000 square miles. Palin sought last year to significantly raise the number of wolves killed under the program by putting a $150 bounty on dead wolves, until a judge blocked the payments.
Palin alarmed conservationists further last month when she came out against a ballot initiative that would have prohibited the discharge of toxic mining waste into some of the nation’s last wild-salmon rivers. The measure failed.
The governor also has been a vocal advocate of drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge — something the GOP presidential nominee, John McCain, opposes — and she favors offshore exploration in the vast, often-frozen waters of the Beaufort and Chukchi seas. A spill there, conservationists say, would be virtually impossible to clean up.
“When you look at her record in the context of what other states have done, including states with Republican governors, her record is weak, and I’d even say ominous in some areas like drilling,” said Kate Troll, executive director of Alaska Conservation Voters.
… conservation groups say Palin’s position on climate change — that it is a measurable reality but not necessarily man-made — defies scientific consensus.
“Palin’s insistence that Arctic melting is ‘uncertain’ is like someone debating the theory of gravity as they plunge off a cliff,” Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a recent statement.
Two years of record-breaking shrinkage of the sea ice has set off a global race for oil, gas, fishing and shipping rights in the newly navigable Arctic. That competition alarms scientists, who already have seen an increase in the number of polar bears denning perilously near the busy oil fields of the North Slope.
Just as worried are Alaska’s Inupiat Natives, who depend on the icy coastal waters for the bowhead whales and seals that have been mainstays of their existence for generations.
“When she got on TV and talked about how she wanted to develop all the offshore and [the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge], she just blew us away, talking like that,” said George Edwardson, president of the Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope, which represents Native populations across the Alaskan north.
Villagers increasingly are seeing signs of bears swimming to shore exhausted. Not long ago, Itta said, a mother and two cubs crawled onto the beach and lay immobile for two days.
In July, scientists found the carcass of a drowned polar bear washed ashore 70 miles west of here.
“There’s a lot of bears in the water right now. . . . Some of them could be dead, drowned already, or they could still be trying to swim to shore,” said Rick Steiner, a University of Alaska professor in the marine conservation program.
Steiner spent months pressing the Department of Fish and Game for public documents discussing the state’s positions on polar bear protection and wolf control. The state’s response? A bill for $468,784 to cover its costs for looking for the material. Steiner eventually obtained the e-mails free, and one confirmed what he had suspected all along: that the department’s own marine mammals staff considered the bears to be in peril.
“The finding that the polar bear will decline significantly across much of its range is correct,” the department’s leading marine mammal expert wrote to his superiors.